![]() |
| On Va Relever Ernest Gabard Source |
"If we'd just kept going for another few minutes we could have been under those trees ahead," one of the men muttered under his breath.
He was surprised when his sergeant came up behind him and said, "And if you keep complaining one of the officers might decide you need a longer stretch in the trenches. Don't think you have to go back with the rest of the company when we're relieved in a week."
"Yes, Sergeant," he actually sounded contrite, which surprised his messmates.
"You do know, don't you Louis, that in this sector of the front, it starts raining in September and doesn't stop until mid-November?"
"And then what, Sergeant?"
"It starts snowing."
"How can you tell if it's summer, Sergeant?" the man next to Louis asked.
The sergeant shook his head, he should have known that the company comedian would have something to say, "No, how does one tell?"
"The rain is warm."
Which gave the men a chuckle, it was an old joke, but a favorite.
From the front of the column, commands were given, and the sodden group of men stumbled forward into the wet and the darkness. Battalion wanted them on the line by sunrise as the enemy usually took notice of fresh units coming up and liked to "welcome" them with a barrage.
At the rate they were going, the sergeant thought they'd be lucky to get there by noon, let alone before sunrise.
It was a war, some called it "The War to End All Wars," which everyone involved prayed was true, but which most assumed was just another piece of journalistic nonsense. One wag had said that all wars would end when there was no one left to fight them, and only then.
It was mid-November, the year unimportant, let us say sometime between 1914 and 1917, as by mid-November of 1918 the guns would have fallen silent. So for the characters in our story, the war has at least a year to run, perhaps more, who can say?
![]() |
| U.S. World War I veteran Joseph Ambrose (1896–1988) attends the dedication parade for the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in 1982, wearing his original Brodie helmet and doughboy uniform and holding the flag that covered the casket of his son, Clement, who was killed in the Korean War. (Text Source, Photo: National Archives) |
Spring is far too nice to remember the dead, as we do on Memorial Day. The earth is coming back to life, the weather is often beautiful as we're on the cusp of summer up here in New England.
But November is a far grimmer prospect, the leaves are falling, or have fallen, the earth is preparing to sleep for the long winter. The weather is often overcast and gloomy, if it's not raining, it's snowing (looking at you Chicago).
So this day is, to me, a time to remember the dead. It might be because one of my beloved cats, Tiger, died on this day in 1998. It was my children's first experience of death and it is not a fond memory at all.
That's just me, I suppose.
But today begins my tale of the Great War, the War to End All Wars, or World War One, as some call it. (Technically it wasn't the first of the global conflicts, some hold that the Seven Years War was the first of those, or World War Zero as I've seen it referred to lately.)
I'm not sure if I'll identify the participants right away, let you guess for a while which army is which. After all, "Louis" is a fairly common name in western Europe. I think this one will be dark, moments of light, but mostly dark.
It was a grim age.


Yet, while all over Western World 11.11 is a sombre anniversary, here in Poland it is a joyful day: our Independence Day as all 3 partitioning empires crumbled at same time.
ReplyDeleteI am not sure if poets have sometimes words of prophecy, but one of our nations greatest, Adam Mickiewicz, in one poem in 1830s wrote a prayer:
"For Great War for Nations Liberation, we beseech, Thee, Lord!"
And yet Poland didn't become really free until 1989/1990 when the Soviet yoke was finally thrown off. But yes, the fall of the three empires which regarded Poland as their plaything must have been joyous.
DeleteLong live Poland! Niech żyje Polska!
Happy Independence Day Pawel! Another tale from you and your Muse, thanks Sarge.... to you and all the veterans out there.
ReplyDeleteYes, it still is Veterans Day and I appreciate the kind thought.
DeleteHey Old AFSarge,
ReplyDeleteYou going to be writing this from the French or the AEF point of view? Inquiring minds want to know. I'm glad your muse decided to pick up the mantle of this storyline.
I don't know yet. I plan to keep y'all guessing for a bit.
DeleteI would love to see a greater treatment of World War I just in general. Especially as Americans, we are often oblivious to the significant upheavals " Over There" - an ending not only to the Concert of Europe but to ideas and governments with their basis in the Late Middle Ages.
ReplyDeleteI enjoy "not knowing" who we are reading about. One does not choose a side; one can empathize with the human condition.
Happy Armistice Day.
Thanks, TB.
DeleteYou get me.
There are some who claim the Seven Year War was started by George Washington... I'm thinking things were pretty well set for the war before he did his part.
ReplyDeleteLet's just say that an argument could be made for his starting the North American piece of that war, but in reality it would have started up eventually on its own.
DeleteI was born not long after it changed to Veterans Day. But all the guy in my Dad's VFW Post called it Armistice Day into the '70s. Was raised helping put out the flags along the streets of downtown Vista, as much as a 4 year old could "help" at first, but got better.
ReplyDeleteGood start, Sarge. It made me think of my favorite cartoon, "Peace on Earth" from 1939 https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7vqdce
It will always be Armistice Day to me.
DeleteJust got in from posting our flag out front in honor of Veterans day. One of the few in the neighborhood, I'd wager.
ReplyDeleteOff we go again. Guess we'll find out where in due course. Glad the Muse is in a good mood, but muddy trenches may dampen that soon enought.
JB
No doubt.
DeleteHappy Armistice Day indeed, Sarge! The Armistice meant that both of my Grandfathers would survive, so allow me to celebrate. Today is a day for comradeship. I will celebrate my Brothers and Sisters today and remember our dead in the spring - for they gave their springs for all of us.
ReplyDeleteBoat Guy
Not a bad point.
DeleteMay all you Veterans out there celebrate many more Veteran's Days. Y'all have certainly earned it. Thank you!
ReplyDeletejuvat
Amen.
DeleteRight back at you Juvat, and all the vets here. - Tuna
Delete👍
Delete"Thank you for your service" is as trite as, "Have a nice day", IMO coming from most people. I went into the service because that was expected and I had some say in what/where I would serve. If not, the Draft would soon sweep me up. I reserve my "thanks" for those who faced combat, those who stayed in and kept the systems working, and those post draft era volunteers. "Thanks" is one thing, respect is another. I have the highest respect for all who served, and slight disdain for those who could have served but didn't. Their "thanks" irritates me.
ReplyDeleteYup.
DeleteWWI
ReplyDeleteThe inventor said the weapon would be so fearsom and terrible that men would never again make war.
I forget what was this weapon. Not chemical. A cannon, I think. Not Big Bertha. The inventor was English, I think.
Anyway, such hubris, a mighty ignorance of what lies in the human heart. Too, those who make war do not engage on the field.
I agree with WSF. The phrase has become trite, superficial, even demeaning. So much more is owed to the military veteran.
I don't look at it that way, you can tell the ones who mean it.
DeleteIt was Richard Gatling's idea, when he developed his gun.
DeleteOf course, the machine gun.
DeleteThank you, merci, danke. It's a cold,snowy gray day here in Québec city. Easy to imagine Flanders, Ypres ,Verdun and Vimy. Poor sods. So young, too young... Peace to us all. Encore une fois, merci boucoup for today.
ReplyDeleteVous êtes les bienvenus, Billy.
DeleteAnd yes, Peace, someday.
Can I humbly suggest that you look at the battle of Hamel, 4 July 1918. To Quote Wikipedia", The Battle of Hamel was an attack by Australian Army and US Army infantry, supported by Royal Tank Regiment tanks, against German positions in and around the town of Le Hamel, in northern France, during World War I. The attack was led by Lieutenant General John Monash, commander of the Australian Corps (1st - 5th Divisions), and took place on 4 July 1918.
ReplyDeleteMany of the tactics employed, such as the use of combined arms, illustrated the evolution of military tactics, from the massed attacks mounted earlier in the war. The objectives were achieved within 93 minutes, just three minutes longer than Monash's calculated battle time.
To give the American Expeditionary Force (AEF) combat experience, the five Australian infantry brigades involved were augmented by ten companies from US Army battalions. Six of these US infantry companies were withdrawn from the front line before seeing action. Hamel was the first time during the war that elements of the AEF were commanded operationally by non-American officers.
It sometimes seems that Australia is only remembered for the Gallipoli campaign whereas it's major contribution was on the Western Front, out of a population of 4 million 416,809 served in WW1.
I am familiar with Hamel, Sgt. We may get there, might be worth a post of its own for the reasons you state.
DeleteGood lads in Oz, mustn't forget them.
https://archive.org/details/youtube-hrv7BVD4CyE
ReplyDeleteUm, I don't see the connection.
DeleteBadger Paw Salute, Tiger.
ReplyDeleteHe is remembered, every day.
DeleteRemember WW1 started at a time of extreme social unrest across Europe and the UK, the time was known as 'The Great Unrest'. Over here there's a sort of myth that the period leading up to WW1 was a long drawn out 'golden afternoon' where everyone enjoyed picnics, concerts in parks and generally enjoyed themselves. That may have been true for a minority but for the majority life was harsh and unforgiving and strike action by workers was increasingly organised. I think it would be an interesting counterfactual as to what would have happened had war somehow been averted. I suspect there would have violent social unrest. It all depends who would have come out on top.
ReplyDeleteRetired
Good point, anarchists and socialists were working to undermine/improve things (from their point of view) while governments wanted to maintain the status quo. Only for the wealthy was it a "golden afternoon."
DeleteI think it could have gone either way if a populist of the left or the right who could mobilise mass support had arisen. As it was people generally rallied to the flag.
DeleteRetired
When the country is in danger, most will. At least I hope so.
Delete