Saturday, February 1, 2025

WFH

Source
Lately, there has been some fuss about people working from home (as opposed to "working from home," which I'll get to in a moment). Especially within the ranks of Federal employees.

A report came out, not too long ago, about the large quantity of office space in Federal buildings which is either not occupied at all, or under-occupied. People (think taxpayers) want to know where are all those people. Who's minding the store?

Well, in many cases, they're working from home. That is, they are not spending one to two hours a day commuting to DC, putting in an eight to twelve hour day (don't laugh, some do), then commuting back to their homes, again one to two hours. I might be a bit conservative on those numbers. Ask anyone who has driven in the DC area in rush hour. Or, more accurately, has sat in their cars praying that traffic will start moving, maybe even get close to the speed limit.

Been there, done that, no fun.

So the new administration wants Federal employees back in their offices. Some people cheer this, some do not, particularly those who have to go back to that daily commute.

Of course, another aspect to all this is trimming the size of the Federal government, which most will admit suffers from a certain amount of bloat. (We can disagree on the amount of bloat, but a fit and trim institution it is not.)

Once upon a time Your Humble Scribe was told, not asked mind you, to work from home. It was during the late "pandemic" of 2020. Fortunately I was what you'd call "between assignments." Which means I was getting paid to do nothing, other than hold myself in readiness should an assignment present itself (which it did eventually).

So every morning I'd get up at a reasonable time (usually eight-ish), fire up the computers (work and personal), check for any new emails (such as one saying "come to the office, you have an assignment"), and then head downstairs to brew up some coffee.

With coffee in hand, I would head aloft and sit down in front of my two computers, one work, one personal, and go through the "morning mail" as Buck was wont to call it.

Eventually I would take the opportunity to shower and shave and put on actual clothing (as opposed to sweats) so that should the call come, I'd be ready. If nothing new was in the offing, I'd head back downstairs and have some food.

Each day would pass with me sitting at the computers, monitoring the work emails, and futzing around on my personal computer. This lasted for a few months until the call came down -

"Sarge, we've got an assignment for you."

"Ah okay, that's awesome. When do I start?"

"Is Monday too soon?"

At this point I'm thinking that as I've been doing nothing for a few months, what could possibly prevent me from starting the new assignment immediately?

I mean do I answer with, "Oooh, that'll be tight, I'm not finished doing nothing yet. Monday is a little soon."

Nope, my answer was, "See you Monday!"

"Uh, you will have to come back to the office."

"I view that as a feature, not a bug. I'll be back in the lab on Monday."

And I went back, with a song in my heart and the wind in what's left of my hair. For you see, I hated working from home. It was stressful, it felt like work had invaded my beloved computer room. I believe fully in the separation of work and home.

That being said, I'm not against folks working from home, if they can still be productive.

I knew a number of folks at the old gig who "worked from home" (there's those quotes again). From what I observed, these folks spent the entire day phoning into (or perhaps Zooming into is more accurate) meetings. All day.

Were they a lead on the project these meetings were for? Sometimes, often they were not, somehow they had found the magic job where you could pretend to be important all day long without actually contributing a damned thing.

OTOH, there were people who were in those meetings for whom working from home (notice, no quotes) worked out well. They were able to contribute in a meaningful way and not have to be physically in the building. They would come in as needed and things worked well, for the company and for them. A hybrid situation if you will (some days at home, some days in the office).

There is a perception, among far too many people, that people who work from home are never productive and are just scamming their employer. All of them. Well, it ain't the case, some are productive, many probably in fact. But you know the old saying, "one bad apple spoils the bunch."

So the fact that some are playing the system leads to the perception that all are playing the system. When in fact it really means most managers do not have a handle on what their people are doing. In twenty-five years at my civilian gig I knew of three, maybe four, managers who would actually get off their asses and go to where their people were working to see what they were doing. The rest were of the "Send me your status report at the end of the week" type. Data would be entered in a spreadsheet and the "status" would be reported up the line as gospel.

Sigh.

Most of my work was classified, so I had to be in the lab. That applies to 99.99999% of all the people working on classified systems. (That 0.00001% consists of the one manager who just tracks status and budget, they don't need to actually see the system, just track that the numbers all line up. They exist and they are important.)

Am I exultant that the new administration is forcing people to go back to their offices?

No, I am not. A case by case assessment by competent management could be done to determine who should be in the office and who can work from home.

But this is the Federal government, competent managers are not that prevalent. Just look at how things have been for the past few decades. Does that look like someone with a brain is actually running things?

I think not.

Yes, the wheat needs to be separated from the chaff. Is this the way to do that (blanket ordering everybody back to work)? Maybe not.

But if it works, those who benefit from the ability to work from home will be able to return to that, the scammers will move on (hopefully), and things will be right as rain.

And if you believe that ...

I have this bridge in Brooklyn you might be interested in.



26 comments:

  1. So many quotes from my favorite gardener but I'll limit myself to this:

    I think myself that we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious. Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases. The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.

    Thomas Jefferson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ol' Tommy J knew a hawk from a handsaw. Even at that early part of our history he saw, and was concerned about, the bloating for the federal government and the trampling of the Constitution in order to enlarge itself:

      I see...with the deepest affliction, the rapid strides with which the federal branch of our government is advancing towards the usurpation of all the rights reserved to the States, and the consolidation in itself of all powers, foreign and domestic...aided by a little sophistry on the words ‘general welfare,’ a right to do, not only the acts to effect that, which are specifically enumerated and permitted, but whatsoever they shall think, or pretend will be for the general welfare.
      JEFFERSON, THOMAS, Letter to W. B. Giles, 1825

      Delete
    2. Any Mouse @ 2:18 AM

      I'm not a big Thomas Jefferson fan.

      Delete
    3. Joe - As noted, not a big TJ fan.

      Delete
    4. Care to elaborate, Sarge? We differ on some things/people/policies, but I believe those are honorable, collegial differences as opposed to what goes on in many other fora. Curious.
      Boat Guy

      Delete
    5. Nothing in particular really, just not a fan. He's often quoted (much like Ayn Rand) by people who cling to a couple of memorable quotes and don't really know the whole story.

      It's not that I don't like him, I just find something off-putting about him. It's a long standing affliction of mine.

      Delete
    6. TJ had no problem slamming other people and looking down his nose at other people. Meanwhile sometimes his own poop stank, if you know what I mean. I get the feeling he felt superior to just about everyone. And, yes, it's offputting.

      Delete
    7. Pretty good summation of why I'm not a big fan.

      Delete
  2. Well... my experience with Federal Workers is that about 1/4 are actually needed in most agencies. At the most. The rest are of the type that slow-roll any actual workers because they make the slower workers 'look bad.' This, is, of course, a generalization.

    The Call to Return to Work is a needful thing. It is a way of potentially thinning the herd. Useful people will be noted, useless will be noted. Departments, divisions and bureaus that don't shed some and remain their bloated useless selves will come under scrutiny.

    Of course, there is a point where one can't cut too much, just see the sorry state that many businesses are in due to financial managers controlling all. 7 managers to one worker. (And, yes, my last job I had at least 7 people I directly reported to. 7 people who had big differences in what they wanted and how they wanted. It was Hell. Literally "Office Space" but without the flare and fun.

    And, really, when citizens call in and get stuck on hold for 2-3 hours at a time (yes, been there, done that) only to be told the workers were leaving because of end of shift or something, and then find out these workers are working at home and the only people actually in the office buildings are a few poor schleps who actually work or the custodial staff (who, often times, are contractual,) well, the citizens' ire is somewhat to very justified.

    There is a middle-ground, where good people who aren't working on classified stuff can work at home or work remotely, and others who don't do well at WFH are in the office. But it's the government, which is bloated with useless unproductive or counterproductive workers. Getting rid of DEI/EEOC will help cull the herd.

    Sticky wicket, eh what?
    My personal experience with the local city government is

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The biggest problem with the WFH crowd is in their management. They have let the flock wander and most have no idea what their people are doing to begin with.

      My company once made a rather big deal about "management by walking around." Training was mandated, processes were created, and in the end management continued to rely on status reports. Very few would actually go down to where the work was actually being done.

      Bad management covers most of the sins of most workplaces. You think only the Federal government has this problem? It's endemic to many large organizations.

      Delete
    2. Crusty Old TV Tech here. Morning Sarge!

      I think the difference, at least IMHO is, management not minding the store properly at GM means less to me than management in FedGov. Mary Barra does not have the IRS to extract portions of my salary directly, like FedGov. One can argue that there are many corporations that have really poor management, yet they stay in business (why?). However, since FedGov is paid directly by my hard-earned geedus, I am much more interested in righting that management ship, so I can keep more of my hard-earned geedus.

      Delete
    3. It is of the utmost importance to fix FedGov first. After that, everything else should follow.

      Or one could hope.

      Delete
  3. I'm on the fence about it. With computer networks, phone networks, etc. a lot of the "paper pushing" that is done by office workers can be done from anywhere and there is no need for the workers to report in the flesh. In which case OMB should do an careful analysis, departments, agencies, and bureaus consolidated into fewer buildings and the excess federal property sold off. BATFE gets two floors, OSHA gets a floor, EPA gets half a floor, etc.

    The flip side is that I have a hard time believing that 99 44/100 of the people working from home are as productive as they would be in an office setting. Much of that belief is that I've never had a job that wasn't a "hands on" type job. Be it loading trucks, pulling orders, troubleshooting the lighting at a gated community, or doing QA in a machine shop (most fun was tying to 3-wire the threads on a M395 x 0.5 external thread while still in the lathe - .018" wires and a 40" calper, with a margin of error about equal to the tolerance of the thread depth). So when faced with the prospect of being able to stay home, well, I'm HOME and not at work, so getting the mindset and motivation that kick me into Work Mode is difficult.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BATFE gets disbanded, period. They are un unconstitutional organization whose sole purpose seems to be violating our Second Amendment rights.

      Hands-on type work cannot be done at home, classified work cannot be done at home. Lots of other things can be done from home, as long as the employee is actually doing their job, I have no problem with WFH.

      Delete
  4. Well Sarge, all that is behind you now, no more dancing to another's tune at least to an employer. It's going to be interesting to see how this plays out in the coming weeks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We live in interesting times. In truth, we always have.

      Delete
  5. I know that the people who are working from home claim that they are the exception, and work hard. Your example of your own experience shows that to be false- you spent five paragraphs explaining how for several months you did nothing but futz on your personal computer while waiting for real work to be sent your way.
    There is a reason why mouse jiggler sales exploded when COVID sent people to work from home.
    I have always had hands on jobs, not cube farm jobs that do little more than generate paperwork that, in most cases, is completely unnecessary. I get work from home assignments, and they are invariably busywork and stupid training that is required for compliance reasons, and is obviously being assigned just to hit the checkbox to comply with some inane government regulation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did nothing because I had no task. I was kept on staff because due to the nature of government contracts there are ebbs and flows in the funding. My company learned, the hard way, after one time of having funding cut, they let a lot of really talented people leave. These people sought work (and got it) elsewhere. When the funding was turned back on, we had no one to do the work.

      As to "cube farm jobs that do little more than generate paperwork" - much of that "paperwork" is mandated by law. Requirements that have to be met, processes that have to be followed. Test procedures for complex systems that must be followed to the letter or people might actually die when the systems are fielded, I've seen it happen.

      Not all office jobs serve no purpose. In your hands on work, does someone hand you cash on payday? Nope, you get a direct deposit or maybe an actual check. Those funds need to be disbursed and accounted for, otherwise the organization loses money and eventually goes belly up.

      Some jobs could be eliminated, sure, but is that ever going to happen? Nope. Bureaucracies grow, it's what they do best. Some need to be in an office, some should be able to work from home. It requires good management to make it work.

      We don't have that at many levels in the world.

      Delete
  6. I don't have as much compassion for .gov workers I guess. I judge them by the folks I've interacted with, and the quality, even years ago was heavily 'didn't earn it'. I think a relo of entire departs to be close to what they support would be better than having a district dedicated to the rapid and random spending of inordinate amounts of scrip. Might help if those in the VA are subject the UCMJ too. I could even see the FBI and other federal police rolled up under that grim book. You want to be a rooster lipped para-military operator, you get the rocks and shoals that go with.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some suck, badly. Some are good. Like any organization you have your good workers and you have your useless ones. This is not limited to the Federal government, not by any means.

      Delete
  7. Since most of my working life, excepting the Army, has been on commission, I don't have much to contribute on the work from home issue. I will say commission compensation wonderfully focus you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We've for at least 36 trillion reasons to closely scrutinize federal workers. We simply cannot afford to continue "business as usual" with a massive workforce getting paid to do something or another. We first need to decide if what they are doing is actually (a) something within the constitutional mandate of the federal government; (b) being done effectively; (c) being done efficiently; and is of higher relative priority than most other federal functions.

    IMHO, probably 30-50% of government workers are doing stuff that need not be done at all, are doing it poorly, slowly and adding cost not value to any part of the process they touch.

    DOD (aside from the bloated staffs and unworkable Byzantine procurement maze) is high on the "necessary jobs" list, and probably a bit better than average on effective and efficient work, but far from laudable. Other departments (Education, Energy) need to be eliminated and their few vital functions placed elsewhere. Every single thing remotely tainted by association with DEI needs to be exterminated and their practitioners burned at the stake (figuratively, maybe).

    Doing useless stuff well is a total waste of tax dollars.

    WFH can be okay for many jobs, but right now, ending it is a tool to begin to sort the loafers from the workers. If a job does NOT need to be done at all, then both WFH and on site are a waste of moeny and the job needs to be eliminated.

    Yeah, commuting sucks, but "pick your rate, pick your fate" and anyone who hates commuting needs to move closer or find a different job.

    Federal jobs are to provide needed services for us taxpayers, not to provide employment for people.

    Argentina's Millei is a model for getting rid of the unnecessary, and we need to cut at least as deep.

    WFH is the lesser part of the screening process, but every little bit helps.

    $36 trillion is an unfathomable amount of money.
    John Blackshoe

    ReplyDelete
  9. "There is a perception, among far too many people, that people who work from home are never productive and are just scamming their employer." Well, there's also the reality that plenty of people who work in the office are not all that productive either.- Tuna

    ReplyDelete

Just be polite... that's all I ask. (For Buck)
Can't be nice, go somewhere else...

NOTE: Comments on posts over 5 days old go into moderation, automatically.