Saturday, August 1, 2026

Background Briefing

(Click to embiggen, or chase the link)
Source
So JB sent me this excellent graphic (above) a couple of weeks ago, and as I'm feeling extraordinarily lazy on this Friday afternoon (as I write) I decided to use the graphic in order to provide you, dear readers, with a bit of background on the armies of Napoléon's time.

(You there, in the back, wake up, this material WILL BE on the final exam. JK)

Anyhoo, much as it is today, military units in Napoléon's time consisted of a number of building blocks, from the individual soldier all the way up to an entire army, everything is, ya know, organized. I mean it's what makes an army credible and efficient. Well, that and the training the soldiers receive and how well they are taken care of (food, clothing, housing, medical care, etc. Oh yes, and pay, how could I forget pay?).

The basic tactical unit for the infantry was the battalion, for the cavalry it was the squadron, and for the artillery it was the battery. Organizations and uniforms tended to change over time, sometimes at the sovereign's whim, but most often due to practical necessity.

For instance, as noted above, French infantry battalions consisted of nine companies of 100 to 120 men per company. That's the 1805 table of organization, by the time of the Waterloo campaign, the number of companies per battalion had been reduced to six. This is what happens when you lose a lot of officers and non-commissioned-officers in combat. The invasion of Russia crippled the Grande Armée¹, the disastrous campaigns of 1813 and 1814 didn't help matters. The French were on the defensive and were eventually pushed back inside the borders of France and the Emperor was forced to abdicate.

So the battalions of the Waterloo campaign were smaller than those of earlier campaigns. The number of men per company did remain more or less the same.

If you'd like a more exhaustive view of Napoléon and his army (now don't all rush at once) you can chase this link, but beware, I've spent many hours over there, going down one rathole after another.

Now what, you may ask, has caused me to dial things back a bit on this series? Well, here's one answer ...

My character in Sengoku Dynasty² standing on the porch of his beach house.

My character in Sengoku Dynasty standing on the beach in front of his house.
I mean y'all knew I played computer games, right? And not to belabor the point, I am, ya know, retired and now have time to indulge myself with such things.

I'll get back to my Napoleonic "What If" series on Tuesday, I've got to figure out how to have the French win one battle which was actually a draw, of sorts, (Quatre Bras) and to make the victory at Ligny even bigger than it was. Because Napoléon didn't destroy the Prussians at Ligny, they got away and lived to fight another day, at Waterloo itself.

So until then, keep your powder dry and your nose to the wind.



¹ The Grand Army, usually what the Emperor called his main army up until it was practically destroyed in 1812, in Russia.
² Great game, for those who partake in such things, it's available on Steam, a fine purveyor of computer games. I've spent a lot of time (and money) over there, didn't feel either was wasted. YMMV

14 comments:

  1. My thanks to JB and you Sarge for the concise graphic, fills in a bit of the background. As to another Steam offering, the wallet is crying in the other room.......:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steam is where a lot of my disposable income seems to wind up. But that makes me happy as well.

      Delete
  2. Sarge, a very interesting graphic of the organization of Nappy’s army. As I read through it I encountered a very vivid moment of deja vu. Slipped back to Army Command and Staff school. The US Army’s organization is VERY similar to Nappy’ from almost a couple of centuries ago. Interesting!
    juvat

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The way Napoléon organized his army made a lot of sense back then and makes sense now as well. Most of the other European powers copied the French way of doing things and once that happened, the French had more trouble defeating them in battle.

      Losers don't get copied!

      Delete
  3. Excellent graphic indeed. Lots of working parts and it's great to see how they fit together. Thanks!
    cuthach

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was super happy to see it myself, thanks to JB!

      Delete
  4. Replies
    1. Succinct and accurate, as all good graphics should be!

      Delete
  5. (Sleepily wakes up from half nap...) "What? A quiz? (Quickly starts pretending to take notes....)

    That is a great graphic Sarge (Thanks JB!). The background of history in clear, concise, and understandable form.

    In reading your supporting information, it all seems to have come down to what a terrible decision invading Russia was.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The reasons were good, sort of, like "stop Russia from trading with arch enemy England." But the project was just too much. The logistics of the time just wouldn't support an invasion of such a huge country. Napoléon's army of 600,000 couldn't be supported and in the end the Russian climate was just too extreme.

      Delete
    2. The Russian tactic of giving ground after a scorched earth denial to the enemy supplies and shelter worked well.

      Armies of that era seem to have planned on eating from the civilians and sheltering likewise.

      Delete
    3. Armies of the 18th Century liked to establish depots, store up what they needed, then advance. In Napoléon's time is when the armies started living off the land, at least in Europe. Both centuries saw the billeting of soldiers on the civilian population, something Americans said, "Uh uh" to.

      Delete
    4. One reason that Marlborough's armies, and Wellington's, did so well was that they insisted on paying the local peasants for food rather than just stealing it. This had two effects (i) more food magically became available, and (ii) the peasants were more likely to be cooperative with information about enemy movements and such. This means that you need talented quartermasters.

      There's quite a bit about this in a book I was given for my recent birthday - https://www.abebooks.co.uk/Man-Who-Broke-Napoleons-Codes-Story/20898139033/bd

      You need to lay off a bit for modern moralising about the past but otherwise it's a good read.

      Delete
    5. dierieme - I have to confess to being shocked that I'd never heard this story before about George Scovell. Fascinating stuff!

      Delete

Just be polite... that's all I ask. (For Buck)
Can't be nice, go somewhere else...

NOTE: Comments on posts over 5 days old go into moderation, automatically.