![]() |
| What Snow? OAFS Photo |
Too much death lately, in the world and personally. I know it's inevitable but it still sucks when it hits close. Friends losing significant others, friends losing beloved pets, it's all too effing much sometimes.
![]() |
| What Snow? OAFS Photo |
One of the regular commenters on Sarge’s blog asked me an interesting question
I see that Kuwatis are using F-15s for target practice. Having paid attention to yesterday's post, I knew that most F-15s are single seaters but these were all two seater "Strike Eagles" as opposed to other types. What's that all about?
Kinda like the Navy guys with the original "Bugs" being fighters and then later ones becoming F/A-18s. Or, the F-14 Tomcat becoming the "Bombcat."
Perhaps a topic you could enlighten us about in a future post?
Not sure enlightenment is in my array of capabilities, but here goes.
When the Eagle first came on board, it was Air to Air ONLY! The Air Force had spent a lot of time, money and influence to get an Air Supremacy capable aircraft. And with a 105 to 0 record in Iraq, it certainly was capable.
However, the pencil pushers in the 5 sided Palace for idiots (no, I don't have any animosity about the place, no, I don't, no, really! Ok Some) decided in order to save money, they would add Air to Ground to the Eagle's capability's.
All hell broke loose. First, air to air is a difficult skill to be proficient at, it takes a lot of practice. Second, the aircraft would need to be modified to carry air to ground weapons and be able to deliver them while still maintaining Air to Air capability's.
This went round and round for a few years and finally a compromise was agreed upon. The F-15A-D models would be air to air only, while the F-15E would be primarily Air to Ground but would have some Air to Air capability.
![]() |
| F-15E |
Here's an interesting article about the capabilities of a Strike Eagle (the nickname for an F-15E).
But, while it does have air to air capability, the aircrews aren't as well trained in air to air as the pilots in C and D model Eagles. (As does air to ground, but the C and D models, which CAN do air to ground, I don't believe we ever dropped bombs.)
| F-15 D (Mine!) |
They could, and would sometimes, put the conformal fuel tanks (shown in the opening F-15E picture above) on the C and D model F-15s. I've flown with them a couple of times. I thought there was a significant reduction in maneuverability, but the Air Staff said that was all BS.
But it's pretty much a moot point. According to this article the C and D models of the Eagle will be retired and replaced with the F-15EX when it comes on line in numbers. In the interim, the C and D model mission will be handled by F-16s, F-22's, and F-35's. Given that the last time I flew an Eagle was 1987 and my jet was already 10 years old and they're just now retiring them after almost 50 years of flying air to air missions. Air to Air requires a lot of very hard maneuvering in air to air which puts an AWFUL lot of stress on both the airplane and the Pilot. So, there's a pretty good assumption that they've had a hard life and deserve a break. But, I'm a little sad to see my jet retired. Even if I am also retired.
Frankly, I think F-15 78-564 looks a lot better than me in our respective retirement roles.
![]() |
| MY Eagle just a new paint job, number and owner (unfortunately that last one isn't me). |
Peace out, Y’all. Sarge should be returning to his normal broadcast schedule tomorrow. See you next Monday!
Well Campers, another week has gone by. Not a lot of "Big" things going on.
| This Big Thing was seen out the back door of our current domicile |
![]() |
| Notice the Electrical Connection on the right and the water connection to the left of the big tree in the middle of the picture. Progress!! |
But to our, unprofessional, eyes some of the areas that were cleared of trees and brush are not clear enough for the buildings that are going into those clearings.
Specifically, and most importantly, the clearing for my Brother's cottage has two large trees in the center of it. Didn't know if that was an oversight or just waiting for the tree clearing guy to get us back on his schedule. Hence, one of the reasons for our meeting.
Upon meeting with the contractor, he said that the clearing guy was coming back this week to take down the mature trees. What he'd brought out last week was to clear the brush and small 2-3" saplings. Okay, that makes sense.
The other clearing area in progress is the area for our hobby huts. A workshop for me and one for Mrs J who affectionately called hers a "She Shed". As can be seen below, we need to take down a few saplings and small trees to have enough room for those.
Another factor that's got to be considered is order of construction. The house is obviously a big deal in that schedule, but we need to get shelter and fence for the horses before they bankrupt us at the horse hotel they're currently staying at.
Oh, and off topic, when you're mucking stalls and shoveling "you know what" into buckets, it serves you well to inspect the bucket and insure that it isn't covered with fire ants. I didn't! The little bastiges are brutal and numerous. Spray Benadryl is an integral part of our mucking equipment now.
Back on subject, juvat!
On subject, aye Sarge!
So, the horse area has high priority. Not sure of the priority for our house versus my brother's cottage and time to construct for each. Hence the meeting this morning.
Mrs J has been working hard on the designs of the structures mentioned. Once we get the "wish list" settled, the Contractor can take them and turn them into blueprints which will take 2 weeks. At that point, construction can start and he estimates it'll take 8 months to complete.
He then can move his teams around all four projects so things can get done simultaneously.
So, that should speed up completion a bit or at least make the 8 month date more of a reality. That's where we are in this project.
Just to change the subject and given the time of year. Mrs J sent me this funny, but true screenshot. Enjoy!
,”
![]() |
| Found on Instagram |
‘True Dat!
Peace out, Y'all!
![]() |
![]() |
| In Memoriam |
Another redo from when I joined Sarge's bandwagon and starting posting.
Back in the day my folks would try and teach me the need for trust in the world. One needed to trust their fellow man to do the right thing or else one would spend his entire life looking over his shoulder for protection instead of ahead for opportunity.
Of course they also taught that once someone had proved themselves untrustworthy...Well, don't trust them. Ever. I'm not talking a simple "letting you down", but actual betrayal. Failing to do their duty to honor their word deliberately regardless of reason. That was the ultimate sin.
Then I joined the military and realized where that ethos came from. My instructors insisted on trustworthiness in themselves and their students. That expectation extended through all members of the military. If you wore the uniform, your word was your bond. You may fail, but you failed while giving your best.
![]() |
An F-4E from my squadron at Moody AFB. |
As a "For Instance", even non-flying readers will realize that an In-Flight Fire is an extremely serious event. They would not be wrong. Unlike a sailplane, the engines are the things that keep you aloft. Without them, you are going to be landing. Whether on a runway or not, is not generally your choice. The airplane is coming down. Period.
Ok, how does the USAF address an Engine Fire? The "Bible" on aircraft operations in the Air Force is affectionately called the "Dash One". The F-4E Dash One can be found here. Just as an example of how important that document is, 40 plus years after the last time I read it, looking through the Engine Fire or Overheat during Flight Emergency Procedure, I recognized some subtle changes in the wording and punctuation of the procedure from the previous reading. That's how serious we took that book. In any case, here's the procedure. (It's found on Page 3-9 at the link above.)
Engine Fire or Overheat during Flight
1. Throttle bad engine - IDLE
2. If warning light goes out - CHECK FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM
Depress fire test button to determine that the fire detecting elements are not burned through.
3. If detection system check is satisfactory (i.e., warning lights illuminate when checked) - LAND AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE
Increasing
thrust on the bad engine after the throttle has been retarded and the
warning light has been extinguished may cause fire or overheat damage,
and/or possible burn through the fire detecting elements.
4. If warning light remains Illuminated or fire detection system is inoperative or fire is confirmed - SHUTDOWN ENGINE
5. If fire persists - EJECT
6 . If fire ceases - LAND AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE
CAUTION
Do not attempt to restart the bad engine. If the fire ceases, and a landing is to be accomplished, make a single engine landing.
Pay particular attention to #5 in that procedure. If the fire light does NOT go out, you are to eject from the airplane. Period-Dot-End of Story.
So, juvat, interesting, but where are we going with this story?
Trust, my Friend, Trust. We had an E-model at Moody that was pretty much a hangar queen. (For the non-familiar, the term indicates the jet has a boatload of mechanical problems which are difficult to ascertain, expensive to fix and the fix may not fix the entire problem.) One of the requirements when a Hanger Queen is thought to be "Fixed" is to give it a "Functional Check Flight" or FCF. This is always flown by a VERY experienced crew and is flown on a fixed profile with specific parameters to make sure the airplane is fixed and ready to be put on the daily schedule. This jet had passed it's FCF flight and was back on the schedule.
I'm Flight Lead for a 4 ship range ride to go and drop practice bombs and fire the gun at the gunnery range at Eglin AFB FL.
![]() | ||||
| No those are not 25Lb Practice bombs, those are inert 500Lb Bombs, but that is Eglin Range. Source |
Typically the aircraft is loaded with 12 x 25Lb practice bombs and 100 rounds of 20mm bullets.
![]() |
| Source |
Bragging rights, however, were worth much more than that. So, one tried their very best.
Unfortunately, on this sortie, I've drawn the Hangar Queen and, even with my best body English, couldn't get the bombs very close or the gun to hit the target. I'm irritated at myself on the way home and we're about halfway there when I simultaneously hear/see the Master Caution light come on and hear the WSO yell something about "Fire" over the intercom. Suffice it to say, I am focused at this point.
The right engine fire light is on. Technically, at this point, I'm supposed to ask the WSO to get into the check list and read me the procedure after which I will perform the procedure. That works well in the Simulator. (AFAIK no one has actually died in the Sim.) I immediately pull the throttle to Idle. Nothing. I decide on a count to 10 before skipping to #4 on the Emergency Procedure. I know it didn't take 10 seconds for that count, more like 1 maybe 2.
Light's still on. So I shut down the engine. Soon as it spools down, the light goes out. I push the test button, it lights up and goes out when I release the test. I have one of the wingmen give me a look over. Nothing, no smoke, no visual damage. OK we get to skip #5 (Thank you, Lord. My takeoff #s in a jet will continue to match my landing #s in a jet.)
Approach and landing are normal, well, as normal as a single engine approach and landing gets, and also except for the fire trucks, ambulances and other crash vehicles near the runway ready to respond if things go south.
We pull into the dearm area. Dearm crew safes the crucial stuff and give the shutdown signal. 1.6 nanoseconds later, myself and the WSO are on the ground and vacating the immediate vicinity.
The
jet goes back into maintenance, the maintenance repair checklists are
applied and she gets back on an FCF schedule. The same thing happens.
Back into maintenance and another FCF. Again a Fire Warning Right
Engine. In that afternoon's Wing Honcho meeting, the Maintenance
Commander wants to annotate the problem in the maintenance forms as a
"glitch" and keep the jet on the schedule. Maintenance Stats...Gotta
love 'em.
At that point in the meeting, the Wing Commander relieved him from command. As he did so, he said "If the warning light comes on, how does the pilot know that the jet is not on fire? If he stays with the jet and it IS on fire, he and his WSO will likely be killed. Is your in-service rate worth that?"
In other words, the Maintenance Officer had betrayed our trust.
The jet went to depot maintenance and AFAIK never flew again, at least not at Moody.
BTW, that Wing Commander went on to 3 stars. IMHO, shoulda had 4. Great Pilot, Excellent Leader, Talented Instructor. One of the leaders I tried to emulate.
Interesting
story, juvat, but what's behind this story? Well, when Little J and LJW's baby was born, she was very premature. That required hospitalization for a couple of months. This story would be about Miss B's
monitoring equipment and sensors. More knowledgeable medical readers
may correct me, but I believe that one of the last organs that develop
when a Baby is
in the Womb are their lungs. Therefore, premies, spending less time
there, tend to have lung issues after birth. Miss B is (was
when this was first published, she's normal now) currently on O2
while her lungs get better. She also wore a Pulse Ox sensor that kept
track of her pulse rate and oxygen saturation level in her blood. It
set off an alarm when either reading goes below the minimum level.
That alarm can, and should, be heard throughout the house.
However, the Damn thing went off ALL THE F.....g time! The medical equipment company says that's caused by the baby moving. OK, maybe. But, then, why does it go off when she's sound asleep and not moving. AKA one of us is sitting right beside her watching when it goes off.
So...Next they said it's a faulty sensor cord. OK. They send a new one. Except that one is for a different model sensor.
![]() |
| Top
two are the new cable. Bottom two are the old cable. I'm not an
electrician, but something tells me the new ones won't work. |
Drive down to San Antonio to meet with the Pulmonary Docs. They hook up their device side by side with ours. There's doesn't squawk and their readings are virtually the same as ours. Guess what squawks.
I mentioned to them my story about Trust and the fire light and asked what, worst case, might happen in the middle of the night if LJW, being extremely sleep deprived and tired, decided it was a false alarm and rolled over and went back to sleep.
After a bit of testing of the new equipment, suffice it to say, the NICU Staff and Docs are on Santa's good list while the Medical Equipment folks...well...aren't!
![]() | ||
| Nap Time! |
![]() |
| The problem will occur in the light gray area at the top center of the photo. |
![]() |
| These guys practice it, me, not so much! |