Wednesday, May 8, 2019

War

(Source)
If you read nothing else today, you must read this.

I first ran across Doctor Grumpy's blog a few weeks ago, very amusing fellow. Who knew he was a fellow lover of history? He's a daily visit now.


I hadn't remembered that the 7th of May was the 104th anniversary of the sinking of RMS Lusitania. There are many historical events I try to keep track of, this one slipped under the radar.

War is cruel and brutal, there's no other way to put it. Were the British in the wrong for shipping munitions aboard a passenger liner? Of course they were. Were the Germans in the wrong for sinking the ship? The U-Boat's quartermaster thought so, and spent the remainder of the war in prison for his beliefs.

One could argue that the Germans started World War I, and one would be only partially correct. The dying Austro-Hungarian Empire was intent on pushing the Ottoman Turks out of the Balkans, and keeping pieces for themselves as well. The resistance to the Empire led to the assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand and his wife Sophie in the streets of Sarajevo.

After that Vienna issued an ultimatum to the Serbs, an ultimatum which the Serbs could not possibly accept without losing their sovereignty. War was declared, the Austro-Hungarians mobilized*, the Serbs mobilized, the Russians mobilized, the Germans mobilized, the French mobilized, and the British prepared themselves by letting everyone know that the neutrality of Belgium would be their casus belli, though most of the Imperial General Staff were quite prepared to enter the war on the side of the French regardless of Belgian neutrality.

The European powder keg exploded in August of 1914. Millions would die, it was the last war waged by monarchies (it is worth noting that the French were not ruled by a monarch). It was the costliest war in history up until that point, in terms of deaths and injuries, and in terms of economic costs. What is worse is that the vindictiveness of certain British and French politicians led directly to World War II and all the agony which followed.

The guns of August may have fallen silent in November of 1918, but they echo still.





* Mobilization meant recalling reserve troops to the colors and generally preparing the armed forces for active service. The Germans sought to knock France out of the war as they thought that the massive Russian army would take a long time to mobilize and move against Germany. The Russians surprised everyone (probably themselves as well) when they were ready quicker than expected and were rolling into Prussia while the bulk of the German army was rolling into France, after violating Belgian neutrality and drawing Britain into the war.

Note: Heute ist mein Geburtstag.

28 comments:

  1. I had forgotten that the Lusitania had gone down so quickly. I also wondered why a ship being sunk two years prior was cited as the proximate cause of the US entry into WWI...

    And I also just found Dr.Grumpy's blog and concur it is a good one. With two physicians in the immediate family, I can relate! Also recommended is the old book from the late 70's, House of God, about life in a big city hospital from the doctors' (intern') perspective. Very funny and unfortunately very representative of the institutions described.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you ever get a chance to see "The Hospital" with George C. Scott and Dianah Rigg I highly recommend it. It is an early 70"s very, very black comedy from Paddy Chayefsky. Just don't watch it immediately before you will be hospitalized for ANY rason.

      Delete
    2. Tom - She went down very quickly, which really contributed to the death total. That book sounds familiar.

      Delete
    3. Dave - Talk to a nurse, even more horror stories.

      Delete
  2. The Lusitania was an example of a tragedy that could have been prevented, many times, by people on all sides of the 'fight' so to speak.

    The passengers were warned, several times, by Germany that the ship was carrying war materials and was a valid target.

    The ship was, in fact, carrying both raw materials and a huge amount of ammunition (literally tons of .303 made in the USA) and other finished products.

    The sub captain could have let it go, even though it was carrying materials, because of the passengers.

    The ship captain could have kept going forward at speed rather than slowing down and waiting for escorts that didn't show up.

    The escorts should have shown up on time.

    The conspiracy theory that the British were basically trolling the waters with the Lusitania in order to bring the US further on their side has some merit, unfortunately. Though I put it all down to mass stupidity and fecklessness rather than an actual plan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Feckless stupidity seems to be a hallmark of human behavior.

      Delete
    2. And fecking brutality at times.

      Delete
    3. The Brits committed a 'war crime' in putting war materials aboard a passenger ship. Absolutely criminal.

      So how was the backlash against the Germans? I smell a well-prepared publicity campaign. Another criminal act.

      From the first time I heard both sides of the story I began to smell a rat, a pretty dead rat at that.

      Delete
  3. "What is worse is that the vindictiveness of certain British and French politicians led directly to World War II and all the agony which followed."

    I was recently thinking about WW I and II and what led to them. I currently think that the cause can be traced back to the settling of the Euro-Asian land mass by early hominids. Ever since two different tribes/bands/groups of people settled there, they have been fighting for dominance. None of them have ever forgotten, or forgiven, any " wrong " done to them by another group. This has led to endless wars ever since. We are currently in a fairly long pause ( for certain values of pause ) between wars there.

    Thanks for the post.
    Paul L. Quandt

    ReplyDelete
  4. Though WWI had a lot to do with WWII, part of it can also be linked right directly to those two rat-bastiges, Marx and Engels. Their corrupting influence can be seen twisting and warping minds and ideas, and inciting fires and struggles, from the beginning.

    How much better the world would have been if their mothers had drowned them at birth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wouldn't blame WWII on those two ass clowns, as much as I'd love to, but they are responsible for a lot of misery.

      Delete
    2. The odd mix of marxism and nationalism that resulted in national socialism in both Germany and Italy was, well...

      Everyone always blames Hitler, but those two jerkwads got their fingers in the pie, too. Hitler was just dancing to the tune they started playing.

      Delete
    3. Nietzsche more than Marx and Engels (Lenin had no original ideas).

      Delete
  5. As always, an excellent post. That said, I do think blaming the Second World War on Versailles is a common and unfortunate oversimplification of the history. It also has been used by many to try and obviate the responsibility of Germany for the later war.

    The punitive provisions of the Versailles treaty were not substantively different than anything that had come before it, including the 1871 iteration that was imposed by Germany on a defeated France. The Allies had lost millions of men and billions in treasure on a war that only became a world war because Germany invaded a neutral country—for whom it was treaty bound to uphold said country’s neutrality—to attack France, a country who had nothing to do with that "damn foolish thing in the Balkans."

    So to accuse the Allies of being "vindictive" sore winners is a bit of a misnomer. France alone had approximately 1 in every 27 of its people killed in a population of about 40 million—and that doesn’t include the millions more of French missing, maimed, and wounded, or the hundreds of thousands of dead colonials. Had Germany won the war, the terms offered the Allies would have been far, far worse. So the Germans had to give up some territory and pay a war indemnity. Yawn. How is that substantively different than any other treaty that ended any other war history?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But the French have always had short memories. Their behavior in the Rhineland was terrible during the occupation. But did the Germans have it coming? Of course they did. Versailles didn't really cause the Second World War, but Hitler convinced the people that it did.

      Oversimplified, yes. The Germans were still pissed at Napoleon in 1914.

      Delete
    2. The myth of the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Versailles Treaty was also propagated by John Maynard Keynes and the self-proclaimed 'intelligentsia' during the interwar years. This 'perspective' is still quite fashionable today.

      Delete
    3. You raise some good points (as always), I need to dig into this further.

      Delete
  6. One may say that there have been only one World War, just with 20 years pause to regain strength and reshuffle the alliances...
    The 1914 "powder keg explosion" was probably going to happen this way or another - Germany was too keen on building naval might to challenge the Brits, French were too eager to avenge 1870-71 debacle, Russia was industriazlizing and strengthenming too rapidly, Balkans were boiling cauldron, Austro-Hungary and Ottomans were rusting fast, and Poles always wanted their state back. Too many people were thinking "now or never".
    Now, regarding Versailles, there is the school that sees it as too harsh on Germans, but I belong to the other school, namely that only fault was that it was not enforced by allied powers in 1933 when Hitler walked away. You want to see real "draconain peace terms"? Look at what Germans enacted on Bolshevik Russia in Brest-Litovsk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good points, problem was that only the French could have stopped Hitler early (in the Rhineland) but the last thing the French wanted was another war. No spirit to do so, can't say I blame them.

      Delete
  7. "the Germans started World War I,..vindictiveness of certain British and French politicians"...Excellent analysis of the causation of WWI. I've puzzled why this is not understood by so many historians. Monarchies,revenge,and the seizure of a neighbors land.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, it's a bit more complicated than that, but yeah, that's the way I see it.

      Delete
    2. That really is what it boils down to.

      Delete
  8. Glücklicher Geburtstag, Oberstabsfeldwebel!
    --Budd von Tennessee (hey, I kinda like that!)

    ReplyDelete

Just be polite... that's all I ask. (For Buck)
Can't be nice, go somewhere else...

NOTE: Comments on posts over 5 days old go into moderation, automatically.