The Last Stand of the 44th Regiment at Gundamuck, 1842. William Barnes Wollen Source |
When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,And the women come out to cut up what remains,Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brainsAn' go to your Gawd like a soldier.Go, go, go like a soldier,Go, go, go like a soldier,Go, go, go like a soldier,So-oldier of the Queen!
Excerpt from "The Young British Soldier" by Rudyard Kipling (Source)
As the Allies advanced into Germany during the final days of World War II, they found many instances where Nazi officials, dressed in their full regalia, had killed themselves. Their wives had also killed themselves. Often their children were killed as well, the younger ones by their parents. These Nazis did not wish to live, apparently, in a world without Hitler. (Or perhaps they didn't wish to face the punishment awaiting them for crimes against humanity.)
In Japan's warrior culture, defeat was not something to countenance. Ritual suicide was accepted as an honorable way to atone for defeat or disgrace. It was also commonly understood as a way to avoid capture and possible torture at the hands of an enemy.
In World War II it was not uncommon for the entire garrison of a Japanese-held island to die rather than surrender. At Tarawa, of a garrison of 4,836 (2,200 of whom were construction laborers - 1,200 Korean and 1,000 Japanese), 4,690 perished. Of the soldiers only 17 were captured, of the construction laborers only 129 Koreans were captured. (It is worth noting that Korea was considered part of Japan during WWII and had been so since 1910.)
The fear of falling into the hands of a particularly brutal enemy has probably been a factor in warfare since its earliest days. Early wars, I surmise, were fought to take things from others, whether it be land, captives, or property, having survivors from the defeated people hanging around after the dust settled was not a great idea. Revenge ya know.
Useful survivors could be sold off, or kept, as slaves, to be disposed of when they were no longer useful. Everyone else was probably killed on the spot. In some of the more brutal cultures, torture often preceded the death of a captive.
In researching yesterday's post, I came across an interesting video (here, it's long - roughly 30 minutes - so I won't reproduce it in this post, you can go there and watch it) which asked the question, "Did Custer commit suicide at the Battle of the Little Bighorn?"
The video also recounts a few other instances of cavalry troopers killing themselves rather than fall into the hands of their enemy. There was good reason for that, many of those who were captured were killed in particularly brutal fashion. The troopers were aware of this and wanted to avoid such a fate, if they could.
I've often wondered what would drive a man to end his own life. In the past many have chosen that way, when they felt that there was no hope, no chance of anything getting better. In wartime it often goes down that way. Surrounded, no hope of relief, the possibility of a slow and painful death at the ends of a brutal and vengeful enemy, why not save that last round for yourself?
Did George Armstrong Custer put his own pistol to his head and pull the trigger as his men died around him on that day in 1876? I don't know, I wasn't there, but it seems plausible.
We may never know.
Taking your own life...besides the Japanese in WW2 I think of 911 and the jumpers ...
ReplyDeleteWWI flyers as well, jumping from a burning aircraft rather than die in the fire.
DeleteThere is an account of the extraordinary survival of a Lancaster tail gunner that jumped rather than die in the burning aircraft. After falling three miles, he awoke in deep snow in a pine forest, badly injured but alive. The initial reaction of his German captors to his explanation of the lack of his parachute was because he hadn't used one was treated with disbelief.
DeleteTrue, but not relevant.
DeleteThis makes me ponder: Were the massive Banzai charges by the Japanese in WWII just an organized mass suicide? Officers in their finest, all medals etc, sword in hand, charging machine guns, and making the decision for their troops. "We'll make them kill us rather than surrender to them!"
ReplyDeleteOne book I read, The Sacred Warriors: Japan's Suicide Legions, goes into detail about the suicides on the Pacific Islands, including the civilians, as told by some who survived.
It was thought better to die fighting (and you never knew, the attack might work, some came close), rather than submit passively to defeat.
DeleteJoe - I cannot speak for every charge in WW II, but I do not believe it was that simple.
ReplyDeleteThere was a belief coming out of the end of the Edo period that martial spirit eclipsed modern technology. During the Satsuma Rebellion (1876-1877), the samurai in revolt did use modern weapons - but they also used traditional weapons as well. The rebels firmly believed that it was their martial spirit - characterized by the term bushido - that would carry the day (no-one starts a military action not intending to win).
That belief never went away at some level, even though the samurai as a class were extinguished. The concept of bushido continued (in almost the same context) through the Meiji, Taisho, and early Showa eras. This has a foundation in even older Japanese beliefs and culture, where one's purity and the righteousness of one's actions can be enough to carry one to victory (whether spiritual, in ordinary ways, or militarily). In that sense, some of the massed charges (perhaps not all) were inspired by the ideal that martial spirit and courage was enough to overcome the enemy, combined with the rightness of their cause.
And to Sarge's point, surrender in traditional samurai culture was considered largely to indicate failure. The great war epics that in some ways institutionalized the bushido ethics - The Tale of the Heike (The Gempei War) and The Taiheiki (The Kenmu Revolt) have many instances of samurai committing suicide rather than being taken prisoner (and, usually executed), and stories of leaders committing suicide when defeat was certain - Kusunoki Masashige, who made five cuts across his abdomen like a fan or Torii Mototada, who after performing a doomed defense of a castle in 1600 against the forces of Ishida Mitsunari which included a 12 day siege, followed by riding out in five doomed charges with 300 men that saw all but 10 killed, committed seppuku (with the invading army courteously waiting at the gates for him to complete the act). Unlike Christian culture, suicide did not have (and does not have) the same stigma in Japanese culture - nor did it, for example, in Roman culture.
I cannot answer for why men would choose, in the end, to end their lives by their own hand rather than in battle - except perhaps that knowing either their acts or the men they are fighting, the alternatives are considerably worse.
Excellent synopsis of the core beliefs behind Japanese actions in WWII (and earlier), thank you TB!
DeleteMaybe Custer realized how his vanity and failure to obey orders combined to get all the men he was responsible for killed and he couldn't deal with that realization. I kind of hope that was it, that he killed himself realizing what an unfit leader of men he was. I think it fitting.
ReplyDeletemaxx
Possible, though the man wasn't known for his humility. Bad as one ages and begins, maybe, to think on the errors of his past ...
DeleteAdmiral Jeremy Michael Boorda, the 25th Chief of Naval Operations, was a high school drop out who enlisted in the Navy, performed exceptionally well and was selected for the integration program where enlisted sailors were sent to Officer Candidate School. He rose through the officer ranks including command at sea and the usual staff jobs until he was selected as CNO. He was beloved by most of the surface Navy, and highly respected.
ReplyDeleteThere was some controversy over his wearing the "V" device on his Navy Achievement and Navy Commendation Medals, earned while in a combat zone, but not specifically authorized as became the practice in later years. CNO Elmo Zumwalt stated that such wear was appropriate but the news media and hack politicians were becoming vocally critical of Boorda over the "V" issue since they could not find other excuses to attack a military leader.
Boorda took hos own life hours before a scheduled interview with Newsweek "journalists."
ADM Boorda was a man of great ability, patriotism, and honor. He did what he thought was right and honorable. Rare qualities at the top levels of our government any more.
A Naval Historical Foundation piece by a senior officer:
https://navyhistory.org/2022/01/admiral-jeremy-michael-boorda-a-case-study-in-deck-plate-leadership/
Contemporary Norfolk newspaper account:
https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/VA-news/VA-Pilot/issues/1996/vp960517/05170652.htm
John Blackshoe
I mourn the death of ADM Boorda, then and now. A pox on those who brought him down.
DeleteJames Forrestal, the man for whom my second ship was named (and a former sailor), committed suicide as well, while suffering from severe depression.
Delete--Tennessee Budd
I know, a shame, his loss.
DeleteYou can read a lot about the interrogation of Japanese prisoners at https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/beyond-sacramento/article230125464.html
ReplyDeleteInteresting story, I learned something new today. (Always a bonus!)
DeleteNot sure I ever mentioned it, but I worked and broke bread with Custer's direct descendent: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_M._Custer_III
ReplyDeleteLast I saw him was a few years back at one of my KofC Fish Frys.
There are no direct descendants of General Custer. A number of newspapers and articles wrote that John Custer III was a direct descendant, but he was not ("journalism"). Same family, different branch.
DeleteThe concept of suicide before capture is actually grounded in great reality. Before modern-ish times, when one side lost, typically the men and boys over a certain age were either enslaved in horrid conditions, like galley slaves for the Caliphate or mining or being used to build dachas in frozen lands, or turned into eunuchs or both.
ReplyDeleteSo killing oneself when defeated isn't a bad way to go. No torture, no horrid slavery, no malnutrition, no deballing. Just a death, sometimes messy, but still better than the alternatives.
Especially true in both East Asia and Southwest Asia.
It is a very complex situation that most modern people today would not understand.
I wonder why the WWII Japanese thought that suicide was better than capture. Possibly because they thought we'd treat them just as they'd treat us, or some horrible sense of dishonor. They clearly didn't have any idea about how we actually treated POWs.
DeleteBeans - Most modern westerners have no clue what hard times are like, also they take life for granted.
DeleteTuna - It wasn't fear of treatment by us, Japanese soldiers who surrendered faced ostracism from their family and their culture.
DeleteBrings to mind Hamas and death cults, you might see the wall, if not so into a death cult and just give it up;.
ReplyDeleteTrue.
Delete