Wednesday, June 4, 2025

The Battle of Midway, 83 Years Ago

Torpedo Squadron SIX (VT-6) TBD-1 aircraft are prepared for launching on USS Enterprise (CV-6) at about 0730–0740, 4 June 1942. Eleven of the 14 TBDs launched from Enterprise are visible. Three more TBDs and ten F4F fighters must still be pushed into position before launching can begin. The TBD in the left front is Number 2 (Bureau No. 1512), flown by Ensign Severin L. Rombach and Aviation Radioman 2nd Class W. F. Glenn. Along with eight other VT-6 aircraft, this plane and its crew were lost attacking Japanese aircraft carriers somewhat more than two hours later. USS Pensacola (CA-24) is in the right distance and a destroyer is in plane guard position at left (80-G-41686).
Source
Midway is not a battle I post about every year, the last time was 2019, which is now six years ago. (In my mind 2019 wasn't that long ago, though in some ways it's now, to me, a very long time ago. Three more grandkids were born over that time!)

As I was looking through the archives this post popped out. I thought it was fitting to rerun this today.

Never forget those who gave that "last full measure of devotion."

I don't.





U.S. Navy Douglas SBD-3 "Dauntless" dive bombers from scouting squadron VS-8 from the aircraft carrier USS Hornet (CV-8) approaching the burning Japanese heavy cruiser Mikuma to make the third set of attacks on her, during the Battle of Midway, 6 June 1942. Mikuma had been hit earlier by strikes from Hornet and USS Enterprise (CV-6), leaving her dead in the water and fatally damaged. Note bombs hung beneath the SBDs.
Some of those who paid the cost of victory:

Torpedo 8
Standing (L-R): Owens, Ensign Fayle (transferred); Waldron, R.A. Moore, J.M. Moore, Evans, Teats, Cambell.
Kneeling (L-R): Ellison, Kenyon, Gray, sole survivor Gay, Woodson, Creamer, Miles.
(Source)
VT-8's first and best-known combat mission came during the Battle of Midway on 4 June 1942. Flying obsolete Douglas TBD Devastators, all of Lieutenant Commander John C. Waldron's fifteen planes were shot down during their unescorted torpedo attack on Imperial Japanese Navy aircraft carriers. The squadron failed to damage any Japanese carriers or destroy enemy aircraft.

Only one member of VT-8 who flew from Hornet on that day survived in the action, Ensign George Gay. Ensign Gay was rescued the day following the battle. Torpedo 8 was afterwards awarded the American Presidential Unit Citation. (Source)
USS Yorktown (CV-5) burning after the first attack by Japanese dive bombers during the Battle of Midway.
Major ship losses of the Imperial Japanese Navy -

Battle of Midway, June 1942. The burning Japanese heavy cruiser Mikuma, photographed from a U.S. Navy aircraft during the afternoon of 6 June 1942, after she had been bombed by planes from USS Enterprise (CV-6) and USS Hornet (CV-8). Note her third eight-inch gun turret, with roof blown off and barrels at different elevations, Japanese Sun insignia painted atop the forward turret and wrecked midships superstructure. Official U.S. Navy Photograph, now in the collections of the National Archives.
Japanese heavy cruiser Mikuma sinking on 6 June 1942.
The burning Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū, photographed by a Yokosuka B4Y aircraft from the carrier Hosho shortly after sunrise on 5 June 1942. Hiryū sank a few hours later. Note collapsed flight deck at right. Part of the forward elevator is standing upright just in front of the island, where it had been thrown by an explosion in the hangar.
Yorktown's VB-3, commanded by Max Leslie, went for Sōryū, scoring at least three hits and causing extensive damage. Some of Leslie's bombers did not have bombs as they were accidentally released when the pilots attempted to use electrical arming switches. Nevertheless, Leslie and others still dove, strafing carrier decks and providing cover for those who had bombs. Gasoline ignited, creating an "inferno", while stacked bombs and ammunition detonated. VT-3 targeted Hiryū, which was hemmed in by Sōryū, Kaga, and Akagi, but achieved no hits.
 (Text Source)
Death of Akagi.
(Source)
Within six minutes, Sōryū and Kaga were ablaze from stem to stern, as fires spread through the ships. Akagi, having been struck by only one bomb, took longer to burn, but the resulting fires quickly expanded and soon proved impossible to extinguish; she too was eventually consumed by flames and had to be abandoned. All three carriers remained temporarily afloat, as none had suffered damage below the waterline, other than the rudder damage to Akagi caused by the near miss close astern. Despite initial hopes that Akagi could be saved or at least towed back to Japan, all three carriers were eventually abandoned and scuttled. (Source)
Death of Kaga.
(Source)
The butcher's bill -

Japanese Losses:
  • 4 fleet carriers sunk
  • 1 heavy cruiser sunk
  • 1 heavy cruiser damaged
  • 248 aircraft destroyed
  • 3,057 killed
  • 37 captured
American Losses:
  • 1 fleet carrier sunk
  • 1 destroyer sunk
  • ~150 aircraft destroyed
  • 307 killed, including 3 killed as prisoners
Of the six Japanese carriers involved in the attack on Pearl Harbor - Akagi, Kaga, Sōryū, Hiryū, Shōkaku, and Zuikaku - only Shōkaku, and Zuikaku were left. They would join Akagi, Kaga, Sōryū, and Hiryū at the bottom of the sea before the war ended in August of 1945.

Japan had sowed the wind, the reaping of the whirlwind was just beginning...






16 comments:

  1. Good choice for a rerun Sarge, absolutely criminal that naval aviators went to war with the TBD and even worse torpedoes, those wearing the uniform deserved better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least the aerial torpedoes mostly worked.

      Unlike the 'new' submarine-launched torpedo with a magnetic fuse that was more dangerous to the launching subs than the enemy. And majorly criminal was the US Navy admirals who 'knew' better than the actual submarine crews that survived trying to use the damned things.

      Delete
    2. German U-Boot force had a similar problem with their torps, their magnetic fuses were wonky. The Kriegsmarine responded faster to fixing that problem than did the U.S. Navy.

      There are still a lot of admirals (we have far too many) who get in the way of getting things done. Because they "know" better.

      Harrumph.

      Delete
  2. Good post and repost, thank you. I can't imagine the horror of being below decks on a damaged and burning ship. Having to fight your own fears - of burning to death, or suffocating in the smoke, or drowning if the ship goes down. The heat, the darkness, maybe only flashlights or the light of the fires to illuminate the scene.

    While it can be argued that Japan had effectively lost the war on 7 Dec, 1941, Midway closed the deal. She still had considerable sea power, but had lost about a quarter of her fleet carriers, greatly reducing her ability to project power in the PTO. But more importantly, I think, was the psychological effect on Japan. Midwayshook the confidence of the Japanese command structure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rattle the people in charge and you've won the fight.

      Delete
  3. Thank you for the refresher Sarge ( and no, it has not been six years at all. Or at least, it cannot have been.).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I mean really? 2019 was that long ago?

      Being retired gives one a whole new perspective on the passage of time.

      Delete
  4. The legacy of the brave air crews lost at Midway was well publicized by many of the new destroyers and destroyer escorts being named in their honor. LCDR John C. Waldron, skipper of VT-8 ("Torpedo Eight") was the namesake for USS WALDRON (DD-699), and dozens of the others were similarly honored.

    That is a precedent which should be used when naming ships, not the execrable pandering which gave us ships named for corrupt politicians like John Murtha; ideologue politicians like Giffords; or the leftist idols like Milk, Chavez, etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a clear, defined set of rules for naming ships, which various politicians (both sides of the aisle) violate for reasons of expediency and to garner votes. As Rickover said, "fish don't vote," when the submarine naming rules changed.

      Delete
  5. Excellent post. Every time I see that photo of the men of Torpedo 8 I think back again to how those were some of the smartest men of their generation. To pass the test to be a naval aviator strained the abilities of many college professors. We were literally sending our best and brightest off to fight in circumstances later generations just cannot imagine. I am less disdainful of the TBD because there is a fundamental underlying reality to war. You fight at the beginning with the best that was available 10 years earlier and war refines that product a thousand times almost overnight. Every weapon you go to war with will be obsolete within a few months of the outbreak of war. I guarantee the Mk46 is high on the list and yet we still have aviators and crews training to fly out a 100 miles away and drop it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Cap'n.

      How we went into WWII and what we went in with, still staggers the imagination. And no doubt we'll do the same again, but with our much reduced industrial base, I'm not sure we can recover as we did back then.

      We live in "interesting" times.

      Delete
  6. I can not recommend the National Museum of the Pacific War highly enough. Two items on display are as close as the USN comes to Holy Relics; Esn Gay's goggles and survival knife. https://www.pacificwarmuseum.org/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've got a buddy who lives down there. I really do need to make it down there someday.

      Delete
  7. I don't know if I would have sent those TBDs in, but it would have been hard for any commander to hold them out of the fight, even suspecting what would happen to them. Hell of a waste of 100+ aircrew.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You go to war with what you have, not what you'd like. That being said, it was a torpedo bomber, when the Japanese CAP came down to meet them, even the later Grumman torpedo bomber would have been a sitting duck. Fighters against unescorted bombers, the bombers lose every time. Most of the problem with the TBD was the Mk-13 torpedo, a bad weapon which could have been fixed but the Navy brass "knew better" and said that nothing was wrong with it.

      Delete

Just be polite... that's all I ask. (For Buck)
Can't be nice, go somewhere else...

NOTE: Comments on posts over 5 days old go into moderation, automatically.